Islamic fundamentalism
Gilbert Ashcar
Global Justice
School 2003
Theoretical base:
* Is religion an empty ideological shell?
- The "affinity" between religious
ideologies and social dynamics
- Fundamentalism and the affirmation of
identity
- Christianity/Islam, Liberation
theology/Islamic fundamentalism
* The "petty-bourgeoisie":
- as analysed by Marx/Engels
- as analysed by Trotsky: the specificities and
generalities of the Russian example
- The peculiarities of the zone of Islamic
civilisation
I Islam and capitalist industrialisation
1) The challenge of capitalist
industrialisation in the 19th century:
the superiority of the Christian west/the
decline of the Ottoman Empire
2) The Islamic ideological reaction: reform (islah)
and fundamentalism (salafiyya)
the origins of fundamentalist puritanism in
Islam: the wahabbi (18th Century)
3) The modernist "anti-religious"
reaction in Turkey:
Mustafa Kemal (Atatόrk) and secularisation/westernisation (1923-38)
II The Egyptian model (1914-199?)
1) 1914-1952: The decrepit Egyptian monarchy,
British domination;
feeble nationalist bourgeoisie and the weakness
of the workers' movement
- the rise and summit of the Muslim Brothers'
Movement (objective reasons and organisational efficiency)
2) 1952-1970: the marginalisation of the Muslim
Brothers under Nasser not just repression, but a socio-political victory (+
Nasser and Islam)
3) 1970 onwards: the end/failure of Nasserism;
the social effects of the Infitah under Sadat
Sadat, the sorcerer's apprentice (the Muslim
Brothers against the left); differentiation of the fundamentalist movement
III The Iranian model
1) The specific characteristics of Shiite
Islam: the role of the clergy in Iran (autonomy and social role)
2) The assumptions of the "Islamic
revolution": 1950-53, Mossadegh's failure; the "white revolution"
3) The "Islamic revolution", an
inverted permanent revolution: the clergy-party (Khomeini's anti-shah
intransigence); the national democratic platform; fundamentalist "regression"
4) The dictatorship of the clergy (the "mullarchy"):
links with the bazaar; socio-political differentiation of the Khomenist
movement (+errors of the Iranian left)
IV Some general questions
1) The fundamental reasons of the historical
cycle of Islamic fundamentalism: "cultural-specific factors" or
general cycle of economic evolution and of the regional and global situation;
social decomposition, the effects of the social crisis and the absence of
progressive perspectives
2) Islamic fundamentalism: a reactionary
danger, although a differentiated phenomenon
the suicidal illusions of the Stalinists and
left populists
the enormous hypocrisy of the imperialist
west
3) Comparison with fascism: common points
socio-economic differences: Islamic
fundamentalism as a "pre-industrial" and anti-western ideology (apart
from in certain specific periods, e.g. under Nasser)
different political functions (in the context
of the weakness of the workers' movement)
different ideological references: religion, "natural"
popular ideology; secularism and atheism
4) Islamic fundamentalism and women
Islam and women
the female base of the Islamic fundamentalist
movements: an explanation
5) Our differentiated attitude towards the
fundamentalists:
attitude towards the Islamic religion:
tactical questions
the counter-revolutionary variant, linked to
imperialism: a determined struggle
the radical populist variant: convergence
against the common enemy; alliance or defiance, the ideological struggle; the
danger of concessions (Lebanon, Palestine)
attitude towards the question of repression by reactionary states
(Algeria, Tunisia) ;
Epilogue: the future of Islamic fundamentalism